![]() ![]() OK a bit about my procedure, I use Negative Lab Pro (NLP) – a Lightroom (LR) plug-in – for my conversions from negative to positive, because it's gives me the best result color wise. And secondly I simply was curious to know which one was fastest. I did this because I need to scan a lot of old negatives, and I for one, think that the scanning process is the only less joyful thing to do in the whole analog photography process, and with these old negatives – mainly holiday photos – I just wanted a quick way to get through them and not lose too much in quality. ![]() That shouldn't prolong the scanning time, unless you add more features, like noise reduction or multi scan, which I don't use. And this part is of course a matter of individual taste, you may prefer other settings then what I used. I started out spending some time finding the right settings in both pieces of software, I haven't included that here. But feel free to add a comment below, with your own experience or advice on what I could do better. You can of course tweak and adjust for perfection for each scan, and that will obviously give you the best result for each scan – in either Vuescan or Silverfast – but like I said that wasn't my goal here.įirst off I want to make clear that I'm certainly no expert, there are a lot of technical stuff I know jack about, This is made purely from a personal perspective. My idea for this little test, was to see which software would give me the best result, at the shortest time. ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |